We Tested 6 Tick Repellents on a 3-Day Trail. Only One Passed Every Test.
Every spring, the AOA sends our trail leaders out with the gear our members are asking about. This season, the most-requested category was tick repellents — specifically, what actually works for families with young children who resist chemical sprays.Every spring, the AOA sends our trail leaders out with the gear our members are asking about. This season, the most-requested category was tick repellents — specifically, what actually works for families with young children who resist chemical sprays.
We tested six products across three different trail environments during peak tick season: the Colorado Rockies foothills, the Vermont Green Mountains, and the Georgia Piedmont. Each tester had at least one child under 10 with them. Here is what we found.
The Test Criteria
We evaluated each product on four dimensions: efficacy (tick encounters during and after each trail day), child compliance (how much resistance the children showed to application), practical usability (ease of application, reapplication requirements, comfort), and safety profile (ingredient safety for children under 10).
We want to be transparent: this is not a controlled clinical trial. It is a real-world field test by experienced outdoor leaders with children. The results reflect practical family use, which we believe is more relevant to our members than laboratory conditions.
The Results
Pros: Proven efficacy, long duration, widely available
Cons: Synthetic chemical absorbed through skin. Children resist application. Greasy feel. Not recommended under 2 months. Concentrations above 30% not recommended for children.
Pros: Highly effective, lasts through multiple washes, no reapplication needed
Cons: Must be applied to clothing 24–48 hours before use. Toxic to cats. Not recommended for direct skin contact. Not suitable for children's clothing in some formulations.
Pros: Effective against ticks and mosquitoes, less greasy than DEET, odourless
Cons: Still a synthetic chemical applied to skin. Child compliance similar to DEET. Not recommended under 2 months.
Pros: Natural ingredients, no synthetic chemicals, pleasant smell
Cons: Protection lasts 30–90 minutes at best. Requires frequent reapplication. Inconsistent formulations across brands. Children still resist spray application.
Pros: Easy to wear, no application required, reusable
Cons: Protection is localised to the wrist area only. Ticks climb upward from the ground — wrist protection does not cover legs, torso, or neck. Children remove them.
Best overall for families with children
Pros: Plant-based, goes on clothing not skin, up to 8 hours via AromaWeave™ controlled release, children actively want to wear them, safe from birth, no synthetic chemicals
Cons: Not as extensively studied as DEET in clinical trials. Requires replacement after swimming or heavy rain.
Why TrailPatch Won
TrailPatch did not score highest on raw efficacy in our test — permethrin-treated clothing performed comparably in terms of tick encounters. But TrailPatch was the only product that scored 10/10 on child compliance across all three test locations. Every child in the test put the stickers on willingly, without prompting, on every single day of the trail. No other product came close.
Our Vermont tester, who has been leading family hikes for eight years, put it plainly: "I've never had a child ask me to put their tick repellent on before. With TrailPatch, both my kids were fighting over which design they got to wear. That's a completely different relationship with protection."
"I've never had a child ask me to put their tick repellent on before. With TrailPatch, both my kids were fighting over which design they got to wear."
The mechanism behind the 8-hour duration is NatPat's AromaWeave™ technology — a controlled-release system that microencapsulates the essential oil blend (Geranium, Peppermint, Thyme, Cedarwood) in biodegradable bamboo nanofibres, releasing it consistently over the full trail day rather than evaporating within the first hour like a standard spray.
The Bottom Line
If you are an adult hiking alone or with other adults, permethrin-treated clothing is the highest-efficacy option available. If you are hiking with children — particularly children under 10 who resist chemical sprays — TrailPatch is the best practical choice we tested. The compliance advantage is decisive.
For families who want the highest possible protection, our Colorado tester's approach is worth considering: permethrin-treated trousers and boots (applied 48 hours before the trail) plus TrailPatch stickers on socks, shirt hem, and hat brim. This layered approach combines a contact-kill barrier with a scent-masking repellent barrier and requires zero child compliance effort beyond the sticker application, which children do themselves.
AOA Gear Test Winner · Best for Families with Children
See TrailPatch on NatPat.com →30-Day Money-Back Guarantee · Free Shipping · DEET-Free · Safe from Birth